What is typically true of structured interviews compared to unstructured ones?

Structured interviews are characterized by their systematic approach, which includes a fixed set of predetermined questions that the interviewer asks each participant in the same order. This consistency is crucial for ensuring that the data collected is comparable across different interviews, allowing for easier analysis and interpretation. The structured format reduces the variability that can arise from different interviewing styles, which enhances the reliability of the findings.

Unlike unstructured interviews, which are more open-ended and allow for flexibility in questions and responses, structured interviews provide a more controlled environment. This control helps reduce the potential for interviewer bias, as all participants are responding to the same questions presented in the same manner.

Flexibility is a hallmark of unstructured interviews, as they can adapt based on the participant’s responses, allowing for deeper exploration of certain topics. Additionally, structured interviews do not typically prioritize qualitative data; instead, they often focus on quantitative data due to their standardized nature. Thus, the emphasis on following a specific set of questions is what sets structured interviews apart from their unstructured counterparts.